GWCT have a weblog which is normally asking you for cash however this one is making an attempt to rewrite history to be able to curry favour with DEFRA too.
Phrases reminiscent of;
These websites are designated for uncommon and susceptible birds (and for often occurring migratory species) by the EU below the Birds Directive.
Your SSSI is probably not designated by the EU in any respect.
While many SSSIs are additionally EU protected websites…
… all perpetuate the concept that these nature designations had been imposed upon a reluctant UK by an aggressively bureacratic EU.
Effectively it wasn’t like that, as even GWCT ought to know.
First, we had been half of the EU decision-making course of. The Habitats Directive was largely drafted by a Brit in spite of everything, one Stanley Johnson, sire of the present PM, and the checklist of websites which were designated are ones that the UK authorities, and devolved governments extra not too long ago, have put ahead to the EU to type half of an EU-wide community. the Habs Directive got here into existence 17 years after the UK joined the EEC – we had been half of its start, on the time a massive and proud half, however GWCT desires to painting it otherwise it appears.
Even the Birds Directive, the primary piece of anvironmental laws agreed by member states, solely got here into being in 1979 – 4 years after we joined up! If we didn’t prefer it, and on the time we most positively did prefer it, then we should always have performed one thing about it then.
No person in Brussells mentioned ‘Oi! Tommy! Deignate the Wash, the Cairngorms and be sure you embrace these bits in any other case we’ll have you ever!’.
There will likely be a lot of re-writing, or reframing, of history over the following few years. The GWCT has a moderately wonky body.
And people with an unclear view of the previous could effectively have a suspect view of the current too.